On 5/11/07, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Probably 98% of the mailbox is from are spammers who've harvested or randomly targeted abuse@ addresses for male enhancement, maybe 1.99%
So? A little filtering should handle a lot of that, procmail even. At least to file the obvious crap into a different folder that can be looked at and blown away
I've had good luck using Spamhaus's ZEN blacklist to filter mail inbound to our abuse desk. Tagging and manually reviewing all messages for a month before enabling it as a true filter showed me that the risk of dropping legitimate email on the floor seemed to be nil. My experience: http://tinyurl.com/3a4xdu Regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverabilty, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA