Elad,

How do you expect to get elected when you are attacking the very people who will be voting in the election?

Further, it would seem you have very little experience in actually operating large scale networks, network equipment or softwarr. You do realize that a LARGE number of devices on the Internet run operating systems that are no longer vendor supported? So even if you could convince ALL vendors to support IPV4+ (nearly impossible), how do you plan to solve the devices I mentioned?Perhaps it's because you can't, and neither can IPV6, except a subset of those devices already support IPV6, so there will less devices left behind than with your solution.

The more you talk, the more uneducated you sound.

Shane

On Wed, May 13, 2020, 3:48 PM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:

For you nothing will work.

From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:39 PM
To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io>
Cc: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>; NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

Peace,

On Wed, May 13, 2020, 10:27 PM Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:

So you didn't even test the implementation and didn't create it - so why you are writing "As a matter of fact". Which fact ? any evidence ?

No, Elad. It is *you* who needs to prove that your concept works. Unless you do it, it is wise (and generally acceptable in IETF and the likes) to assume it doesn't.

So far, you haven't done so.

Having said so, when it comes to your "anti-spoofing solution" (sic!), I even have dedicated certain time reviewing it and writing a response. Based on the concepts I've seen, I honestly wonder if you ever got the appropriate engineering degree.

By the way, what you have published as your "biography" on the RIPE Exec Board candidate page doesn't quite help to sort out the latter statement.

--

Töma