On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com> wrote:
I won't argue against calling Linux "wrong". However, the linux way of dealing with ARP is well tuned for "host" and not "router" duty.
I love Linux and use it throughout my work but I can't tell you the number of times its ARP behavior has bitten me. If you send a packet to a VIP on a Linux box and it doesn't have an arp entry for the default gateway, the Linux box will send an arp request... with the vip as the source. That is just wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Use the damn interface IP when you arp for something on that interface. If the router doesn't happen to like the bad arp (since the VIP isn't on the router's LAN) the router will ignore it. And your service will merrily pop up and down depending on whether the Linux box has any traffic to originate. Okay, I'm done venting now. -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004