On 12/22/05 1:35 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote: P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems
133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have noticed problems overnight.
199.128.0.0/9 too.
Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of smaller allocations) whenever datasize during processing exceeded certain amount. The bad data was present at 2 of 4 servers for duration of the night but dns was being
so 50+% of your system was hozed for some long period of time :( bad.
changes same time as well, so I don't know how much affect
but apparently considerable; this is the most serious
with 128/8 and there was problem in months.
'most serious problem in months' ... this has happened in smaller chunks during the past 'months' ? yikes... is that noted on your site so users of the 'service' will know what sorts of 'problems' they might be encountering due to their reliance on this 'service'?
I wonder how many problems cymru has had in that period? I'm guess not so many...
I mean this in a nice way, really. Look. Smiley. :) Use a blacklist, pay the price. I'd like to know how many people actually went to their boss and said "It was that guy Williams fault even though I control and am responsible for the network.....!" -M<