8 Dec
2010
8 Dec
'10
2:26 p.m.
On 12/8/10 11:59 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
Just because we've been treading water as fast as possible to try to stay above the drowing point in small prefix ranges does*not* mean we have extra headroom to waste on even smaller ranges. I've started contemplating filtering out blocks smaller than /22, and trusting that somewhere, someone will be sending out a supernet that covers the smaller bits.
Except that when you have legacy resources (such as /24 end user allocations), there is no supernet announcement since these blocks could technically be anywhere in their respective regions. -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org