12 Jan
2009
12 Jan
'09
1:59 p.m.
On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland <nanog@shankland.org> wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for. Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok. I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.
That has not been my experience. Peering wars have been an issue, but aside from that, they've been fine. (This is transit in San Francisco at the gigabit-plus level.)
Jim Shankland
Seconded. We also have Cogent for gigabit transit. I had far more problems in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent. -brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992 Email: brandon.galbraith@gmail.com