4 Jun
2012
4 Jun
'12
4:21 p.m.
On 6/4/12 3:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Well, I note that at least the .secure promoters haven't decided it's a good idea:
the _known_ .secure-and-all-confusingly-similar-labels promoters. the reveal is weeks away, followed by the joys of contention set formation. there may be more than one .secure application, and who knows, perhaps a .sec in the bag, or a .cure, or a .seeker, or .sequre, or ... however, yeah, the requirement bites at contract / delegation time, so about a year in the future. -e