Or artificially high ... On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a number of reasons.
Owen
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first time when native IPv6 on google statistics (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
-- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net