I guess I've got a little bit of a mad on about this topic. Hit "D" now. -------- floresp10@cox.net ("Paul A Flores") writes:
What you have to remember is that having a degree or certification allows the non-clue full out in the 'real' world to easily tell the difference between you and say, the world's smartest garbage man.
The trouble is, often times I'd rather hire the world's smartest garbage man. I never forget that when I got done interviewing for my first full time programming job I went back to my job fixing cars and pumping gas, and my fallback plan in case programming didn't work out was driving a tow truck (which paid better than either.) As it happens they hired me, and now my skills have atrophied to where I actually pay other people to fix my car since I don't grok all the new hoses and computer thingies they have now. -------- bicknell@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) writes:
So what you're saying is, if I hadn't dropped out of high school during my 17th trip around Sol, I wouldn't've gotten stuck in this dead end job?
I said college provides those skills. I did not say college was the only way to get those skills. The converse is true as well, having those skills doesn't guarantee success.
Actually you said...
If you ever want to become a team leader, or a manger, or run a theoretical group you are going to need the math and English backgrounds that college provides. ...
...and your use of the word "ever" is what cost me a higher score on the nanog all-time posting stats just released here. As of ten years ago, I've been assured by professional educators that I am up to snuff on the things one is supposed to learn from a masters' program. But before that I'd been completely self taught and there were enormous gaps in my knowledge -- yet the code and docs I wrote are in some cases still in production use, and I set and held records for operational uptime as what's now called a "sysadmin", and I'm having a lot of trouble relating any of that to the presence or absence of a degree or vendor certification. -------- bicknell@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) also writes:
Cisco has done an excellent job @ brainwashing the IT community. The have (unfortunately) set the standard for "Network Engineers".
I'm biased, see .sig, but having been through the process, and seen what other vendors (eg, Microsoft, Novell) do with their programs I do believe that Cisco wants their certifications to mean something.
I'm also biased, but as I told you when you and I shared a reporting chain, I never held your CCIE against you since you'd demonstrated competence. I have met more CCIE's who were gibbering morons hiding their lack of skill behind their vendor certification thatn I have met CCIE's who, like you, probably ended up teaching the teacher a thing or two during "the process." In 1981 and '82 I worked for Golden Gate University, and part of my job was as a lab aid for COBOL and database students. A more earnest crew, I have never met. But I can assure you that 19 out of 20 of those students were going to come out of the program knowing exactly what was required to pass the tests and get a job, and not one speck more. Give me someone with the yearn to do and to know and to succeed, and I can plug them into the right team and get a hell of a lot more work done, than if you give me someone who has *only* the right letters after their name. Again, statistically speaking, CCIE has more often indicated moronhood than excellence, amongst those I have met. I forgave you yours, but only after watching you carefully for a couple of months to make sure that CCIE was an irrelevant accident in your case. -- Paul Vixie <vixie@eng.paix.net> President, PAIX.Net Inc.