On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 12:04:43 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
The solution is:
All I see there is some handwaving about separating something from something else, without even a description of why it was better than what was available when you wrote the draft. I don't see anything about how it's supposed to work - for example, if my cell phone had an IP address via DHCP from my home wireless router but also has an IPv6 from cellular connection, how *exactly* does it *securely* fall back to cellular if a thunderstorn knocks out Comcast's gear in the area? It's little details like that which were why your IETF draft wasn't taken seriously, and your commentary today isn't doing any better. Try attaching an actual protocol specification - preferably one that you've actually got at least somewhat-working software to implement it. I guarantee that you'll learn a few things in the process...