we'll if ICANN't .. maybe HECANN (*trying out humor*). this idea of second internet doesn't make sense. icann alone is already a handful. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Ken <ken@sizone.org> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said: >I come across this interesting link. > >http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828&tag=nl.e036 > >Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?
Funny, tho - being succeptible to govt pressure CREATES an alt root DNS structure. You'd think the smart thinkers in the govt woulda figured that out. Apply pressure and it splinters. Sometimes easier to supervise if its in one pile, no?
Also, "new DNS = whole new internet"? lol.
/kc -- Ken Chase - ken@heavycomputing.ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Disclaimer: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/