Re: 240/4

* Pekka Savola:

Do we need to classify anything (yet)?

I say the proof is in the pudding. Once some major user decides they'll need 240/4 for something, they'll end up knocking their vendors' (probably dozens) and their own ops folks' doors.

If there's risk that we'll see end user assignments from 240/4 at any time in the future, this certainly reduces the set of possible experiments even further. So I think it makes sense to designate part of it as "private use, not subject to allocation" if anybody sees any benefit from encouraging experimentation.