20 Oct
2014
20 Oct
'14
3:22 p.m.
On 05/10/14 18:44, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
The *real* problem isn't the testing. It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data. Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a
At least "name and shame" is something more useful than nothing done.
Has it worked for the deaggregation offenders named by the CIDR report?