There are some pretty impressive quotes there to take away ..
"We are totally convinced that the factors that made IPv4 run out of addresses will remanifest >themselves once again and likely sooner than a lot of us might expect given the "Reccomendations" for >"Best Practice" deployment."
If I am understanding this quote correctly the author is worried IPv6 will run out of addresses so won't make the switch... Granted only 1/8th of the IPv6 space has been allocated for internet use but that number is still so mind-boggling _huge_.. But what does worry me is a lot of peoples inability to future proof themselves, it seems a lot of people would rather wait until its too late or things are falling apart and react rather than protectively getting a migration or even support package in place in-case v4 just "stops working". And by "stops working" I mean some big service provider decides to shoot itself in the foot and just switch off IPv4 support for their services, not likely to happen any-time in the near future but still a possibility. -- mitch On 16/09/12 17:55, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from some of the posters is kind of shocking. It's also pretty disappointing if these are the people providing internet access to end users. We focus our worries on the big guys like AT&T going IPv6 (which I'm sure but they're slow), but these small operators are a much bigger problem.
http://forum.ubnt.com/showthread.php?p=355722
http://forum.ubnt.com/showthread.php?t=53779
~Seth