30 Nov
2012
30 Nov
'12
6:23 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:01:54PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
implementation would not have been accepted. The result would be a draft that would never be adopted and so it is back to start.
"Adopted" by whom? The procedure, even at the time, did not require in any way IETF consensus. Getting a number requires that you tell others what is going on, not that you justify the going on itself.
Did you ever read any of the IETF mailing lists and looked at the email addresses of those people pushing the hardest? At least in the ones I'm subscribed to the bias is obvious.
I think that _ad hominem_ arguments are fallacious, and should be dismissed as such. A -- Andrew Sullivan Dyn Labs asullivan@dyn.com