4 Jun
2001
4 Jun
'01
12:26 a.m.
In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric
no, it's the transitions from 0 to 1 or vice versa that take the energy. that's why the nanog list is so repetitive, saves money. randy