Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only good thing I can say about this proposal is that 10GB is not NEARLY enough to get your typical luser to think about changing their configuration. Therefore, it probably won't have an impact on v6 adoption. (That ghod.)
Nor was it intended to. From what I understand it's an experiment on the usability of dual-stack servers at this point. Porn happens to be a test load. We (myself, previous and current employers) have been deploying dual stack servers (with published AAAA records) for all sorts of applications which may or may not give us some reasonable samples of client behavior (usenet news, ntp servers, open source ftp http mirrors). Experience would suggest that before content providers can build a business case for dual stack servers they need to confirm they're not going to loose eyeballs as a result.
--TTFN, patrick