Or wait ILNP/ILA https://lwn.net/Articles/647515/
On 15 июля 2015 г., at 0:09, Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com> wrote:
Exactly.
As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The myth of easy renumbering and/or having multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from time to time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). Remember SHIM?
Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections is going to go BGP/PI.
---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM To: Chuck Church Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
What about dual-homed customers? Or are they all expected to have their own PI space?
This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space?
R's, John