In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=SpjMbeWFRt4OOphw@mail.gmail.com> , Baldur Norddahl writes:
Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would be unstable.
This is not anycast NAT64. It is anycast DNS64 with the well known 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box. While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need to be critised for faults that don't exist with it. Mark
Sorry time to get to sleep.
Regards
Baldur Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>:
Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service. Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack@gmail.com>:
For the record:
Tim,
I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread:
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
but I figured I'd let you know that:
https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use.
Regards, -Erik
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
-- Tim:>
-- Tim:>
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org