On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
On 13/03/2012, at 8:14 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 12 Mar 2012, at 21:15 , William Herrin wrote:
Not at all. You just build a second tier to the routing system.
It's so strange how people think a locator/identifier split will solve the scalability problem. We already have two tiers: DNS names and IP addresses. So that didn't solve anything. I don't see any reason a second second tier would.
I think you have encountered an article of faith Iljitsch :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirection: Any problem can be solved by adding another layer of indirection.
"But that usually will create another problem." Then the test must be: does any particular proposed layer of indirection solve more intractable and more valuable problems than it creates, enough more valuable to be worth the cost of implementation? Still, I concede that it would be "better" to more effectively use the indirection layer we have (DNS) rather than create another. Better, but not necessarily achievable. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004