Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

On 21 Nov 2021, at 00.00, Joe Maimon <jmaimon@jmaimon.com> wrote:

There is a clear difference of opinion on this, that there stands a very good chance that prompt implementation now may prove to provide significant benefit in the future, should IPv6 continue to lag, which you cannot guarantee it wont.

The reassignment being implemented faster than IPv6 seems like a big assumption.