On 17 Mar 2017, at 2:08 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Mark Kosters <markk@arin.net> wrote:
On 3/17/17, 12:26 PM, "NANOG on behalf of William Herrin" < nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of bill@herrin.us> wrote:
Hmm. That sounds like an ARIN-side bug too. ARIN's code responded to corrupted data by zeroing out the data instead of using the last known good
there were no bugs in ARIN’s software in regards to this issue. We followed exactly what RIPE told us to do.
Hi Mark,
That shot my eyebrow up. You misspoke here, right? There's no bug -solely because- you did what the design said to do? The design calls for some self-check information and it's not a critical design bug to zero-out the publish if the self-check fails?
Bill - See previous reply. The data was both correctly formatted and signed, so the agreed integrity checks passed. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN