2 Jan
2015
2 Jan
'15
8:29 a.m.
On 2 Jan 2015, at 01:54, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> wrote:
You don't need LDP on RR as long as clients support "not on lsp" flag (different implementation have different names for it) There are more and more reasons to run RR on a non router HW, there are many reasons to still run commercial code base, mostly feature set and resilience.
And test coverage. As Saku alluded to earlier in the thread, rr<->rr-client outages are painful. I’ve certainly seen a number of them caused by inter-op issues between implementations. Running at least one RR which matches the code-base of the client means that at least you’re likely to have fallen within the test-cases of that vendor’s implementation. r.