Hi, (Also never been in Australia, unfortunately...) Netname is "PMANET": ...isn't it OK to assume it could stand for "Port of Melbourne Authority Network"? * pma.vic.gov.au is not operational (i wonder what can be found with passive dns) * vic.gov.au is still operational. Quick googling also allowed me to find this: https://www.portofmelbourne.com/about-us/port-history/timeline/ "1996 Melbourne Port Corporation established as successor to Port of Melbourne Authority." Regards, Carlos On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, Mel Beckman wrote:
A quick check of one of your facts produces unexpected results, so you might want to perform more research. According the APNIC, 139.44.0.0/16 does not ?belong unambiguously to the Port Authority of Melbourne?. It belongs to an individual, with an office address at a building called ?Port Authority of Melbourne?: person: Rob Shute
address: Port of Melbourne Authority Level 47 South 525 Collins St
country: AU phone: +61 3 9628 7613 e-mail: djk@pma.vic.gov.au nic-hdl: RS54-AP remarks: ---------- remarks: imported from ARIN object: remarks: remarks: poc-handle: RS546-ARIN remarks: is-role: N remarks: last-name: Shute remarks: first-name: Rob remarks: street: Port of Melbourne Authority Level 47 South 525 Collins St remarks: country: AU remarks: mailbox: djk@pma.vic.gov.au remarks: bus-phone: +61 3 9628 7613 remarks: reg-date: 1970-01-01 remarks: changed: hostmaster@arin.poc 20001127 remarks: source: ARIN remarks: remarks: ---------- notify: djk@pma.vic.gov.au mnt-by: MNT-ERX-PRTMELAUTH-NON-AU last-modified: 2008-09-04T07:31:33Z source: APNIC The building called the Port Authority of Melbourne is not, by all accounts, a government agency. It?s just the name of a 54-story office building, like the World Trade Center in NYC. In fact, World Trade Centre (Melbourne) is another name for the building, and although it houses the Port of Melbourne Authority agency (on Level 4, not Level 47), it appears to be largely just a toney address for business offices. Some, perhaps, not unlike American ?Mail Boxes Etc? (although I haven?t confirmed this). But the following Wikipedia excerpt says this unambiguously:
The building currently houses some offices of the headquarters of Victoria Police, and the Victoria Police Museum , a collection of exhibits and memorabilia from over 150 years of policing in Victoria.[3] It also houses offices for companies, including Thales Australia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Melbourne_Authority
Now, I?m not an Ossie, and in fact have never been down under, but it seems likely that the address in the registration is akin to a US business having a World Trade Center address in NYC. It means nothing as far as APNIC asset ownership is concerned. It?s just an address.
I could be wrong. However, it seems a simple fact to verify by calling management at that building. I tried sending email to the registered ?.gov.au? address:
djk@pma.vic.gov.au
But the domain does not exist.
-mel beckman
On Sep 6, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
Few of you here probably know about this, but nearly a week ago now an article appeared in South Africa's largest and most popular online tech publication, MyBroadband.co.za. It detailed many, but certainly not all of the results of my multi-month investigation of a massive and ongoing fraud involving the theft of large numbers of large (generally /16 or larger) abandoned legacy blocks, taken from the AFRINIC region and beyond:
https://mybroadband.co.za/news/internet/318205-the-big-south-african-ip-addr...
For various editorial reasons, the article that was published actually downplayed the magnitude of the of the thefts quite dramatically. The totality of the IPv4 space that has been stolen or squatted, primarily but not exclusively, from South African companies and South African national goverment agencies and departments is actually at least 5x bigger than what was reported in the MyBroadband.co.za article.
The overwhelming majority of this stolen and squatted IPv4 space has been helpfully routed by Cogent (AS174), to their customer, FDCServers of Chicago, and then on to the prefered destinations of a certain Mr. Elad Cohen of Israel, and his company Netstyle Atarim, Ltd. (I have saved traceroutes up the wazoo that prove the involvement of FDCServers, in particular, in all of this.)
Mr. Cohen has been exceptionally prolific in his IPv4 theft and squatting activities, basically grabbing everything that wasn't nailed down, both within the AFRINIC region and also within the APNIC region.
In order to try to legitimize all of these thefts and squats, Mr. Cohen created quite a sizable number of fradulent route: objects within the Merit/RADB data base which, as most here should already know, has essentially zero authentication of any kind before it allows J. Random Luser to add pretty much any any route: object he wants to the RADB.
Here's a full listing of all of Mr. Cohen's RADB route: objects as they existed as recently as August 17th:
https://pastebin.com/raw/ZNgNuvtt
And here is the short summary version showing just all of the prefixes/CIDRs that Mr. Cohen was effectively claiming rights and/or title to as of that same date:
https://pastebin.com/raw/4LTaCg5R
Plese do note the numerous blocks of size /16 or greater.
The bottom line is that this one tiny little Israeli company was effectively claiming rights to a total of no fewer than 1,015,808 IPv4 addresses as of August 17th, 2019. (Not too shabby for one lone guy who teaches programming classes as a side job!) Vitrually all of the space is "legacy" IPv4 space, and generally consists of blocks having sizes of /16 or larger.
Some of Mr. Cohen claims in his RADB entries are as humorous as they are pathetically fradulent. For example, Mr. Cohen has effectively claimed rights to 139.44.0.0/16 which unambiguously belongs to the Port Authority of the City of Melbourne, Australia. But hell! That's merely city property! Mr. Cohen's limitless appetite for other people's IPv4 space is more vividly on display in his claims to ownerhip over the 168.198.0.0/16 block, which actually belongs to the Department of Finance of the Australian national government. And I haven't even mentioned yet another of Mr. Cohen volumous IPv4 acqusitions, the 165.25.0.0/16 block, which he did not see fit to create an RADB entry for, but which he's been squatting on for for quite some time now, quite clearly with the aid and assistance of both Cogent and FDCServers. That one belongs to th City of Cape Town, South Africa. That city's engineers have been struggling to regain control of their block back from Cogent, from FDCServers, and from Mr. Cohen for some time now. I know because I've personally spoken to them about it. Cogent, in its infinite wisdom, is continuing to fight the city for control over property that clearly and righfully belongs to the City of Cape Town, even as we speak:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ytRj1CtuVhDa0eGu4BT-oEz593y5EwJa/view
When asked for LOAs attesting to his legitimate authority to route at least a few of these blocks, Mr. Cohen has produced blatantly forged documents, many of which appeared in the MyBroadband.co.za story. And when I say "blatant" that's a gross understatement. Any half-way decent forger would consider these documents an embarrasment. The documents all bear identical signatures, and identical and vaguely official looking stamps, and purport to actually be sales reciepts attesting to the alleged purchases, by Mr. Cohen's offshore Seychelles Islands shell company, Afri Holdings, Ltd., of various /16 blocks from a mysterious company called Afrivestment, Ltd., which may actually exist in some faraway galaxy, or in Mr. Cohen's active imagination, but which both Google and OpenCorporates.com seem to agree exists exactly noplace on this planet. Here are the manufactured LOAs supplied by Mr. Cohen:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hVjmR6u0ANltuXtZ-Kng8io-EGFyevTR/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x_44_H5hkcFLhEwpkwfFoR5PJUyXHzxJ/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yQyqn4q_f3bt-wDVoN1FzbXf1k58DXtK/view
Recently, Cohen started to move some, but not all, of his stolen and squatted IPv4 blocks off of Cogent/FDCServers and onto a friendly little bullet-proof hosting company in the Netherlands named IP Volume, Inc. (AS202425) and/or to its several sister networks, e.g. AS204655 - Novogara Ltd., all of which, coincidently, just happen to be owned by the exact same pair of Dutch gentlemen who previously owned the notorious Ecatel, follwed by the notorious Quasi Networks. (IP Volume, Inc. appears to have intherited all or nearly all of its legitimately assigned IP space from its predecessor entities, Ecatel and Quasi Networks.)
Despite these relocations, many of Mr. Cohen's stolen and squatted blocks are still helpfully being routed to Mr. Cohen's preferred desitnations by his good friends at Cogent and FDCServers, even as we speak. The current set of such routes that Cogent is maintaining, at the moment, apparently on behalf of their customer, Mr. Cohen, consists of the prefixes listed here:
https://pastebin.com/raw/EA3xJVLF
When I noticed two days ago that all of these routes were still up I was deeply confused. Did both Cogent and FDCServrs not get the memo?? Do they not know yet that Cohen is stealing stuff, left, right, and sideways? Did nobody even tell them about the MyBroadband.co.za article which was published this past Sunday? I decided that it was incumbant upon me to find out.
Thus, more that 48 hours ago now I sent the following polite but firm inquiry to Cogent, and a separate nearly identical one directly to the CEO of FDCServers, Mr. Petr Kral (petr(at)fdcservers.net).
https://pastebin.com/raw/ztipqE96
A full forty eight hours later, I have received no reply whatsoever from either Cogent or FDCServers, not even a "Go pound sand" type of response.
More importantly, most of the stolen IPv4 space that I called out, very specifically, to both Cogent and FDCservers two+ days ago now is still being routed by Cogent/FDCservers to their fun-loving and, I'm sure, promptly paying customer, Mr. Cohen. If neither Cogent nor FDCServers still do not know now that Mr. Cohen is a crook, and that he has glommed onto quite a lot of stolen and squatted IPv4 space... which they have been helpfully routing for him, no doubt in exchange for some handsome payments... then I am foreced to say that it appears to be a reasonable conclusion that it must be because neither Cogent nor FDCServers really wants to know what sort of a character Cohen is, or what he has been up to, specifically with their ongoing and material assistance.
But you all be the judges. What does it look like to you?
Regards, rfg