Re: moving to IPv6

Brett Frankenberger wrote:

:: Sean M. Doran writes ::

This from the same guy who routinely bashes ATM in the Internet Infrastrucutre Backbones (a view I agree with). Didn't you just recently post that you thought you were getting old because you liked simple things and didn't think there was much merit to doing routing at Layer 2 *and* Layer 3? And now you want connection state in many boxes along the path of a TCP session?

Are you sure you're not confusing Sean with me? We both worked for Sprint :) --vadim