ICANN won't say yes. Now that a new fee for TLD operators goes to ICANN, they won't want to give it up. Simple non-profit business practices. If ITU operates it, they would keep the existing fees and then add a few others. I think we've already seen the bottom in terms of fees to operate a registry. Even as everything to do the job gets cheaper, the fees to kick upstairs will probably keep going up. To keep this on-topic, I think that the operational internet won't have much to say as long as the control is managed/moved seamlessly and no unusually draconian policies are put _into practice_. I'm positive there are already some pretty draconian polices on the books, but because they haven't become operational issues yet, no one worries about them. DJ Owen DeLong wrote:
What if the UN says ITU should run the TLDs, ICANN says yes, and, a significant portion of the operational internet says no?
Owen
--On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:53 AM -0800 Ross <rosshosman@spamarrest.com> wrote:
No government will ever have the internet's best interest in mind when they talk about controlling it. Luckily government control has been kept some what to a minimum so far but it's growing rapidly and this is another attempt for a government body to "control" the internet.
I wonder what new rules will be put in place if the ITU gets control?
I also wonder if the ITU can really take control. What if the U.N. says the ITU should run the TLD's and ICANN says no?
On Mon Feb 21 18:15:00 PST 2005, Joel Jaeggli <joelja @darkwing.uoregon.edu=""> wrote:</joelja>
> When I hear Robert Mugabe talk about internet governance I don't really > get the impression that he has the interests of the people of Zimbabwe at > heart. > > joelja > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dave Crocker wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:45:12 -0500, Scott W Brim wrote: >>> > I'm intrigued at the failure to distinguish between the web and >>> > >>> > email, given that spam is a messaging phenomenon, not a publishing >>> > phenomenon. >>> > >>> It's actually a failure to distinguish the web from the Internet >> >> i was probably too cryptic. yes, they are using the term 'web' to mean 'the internet'. >> >> the problem is that professional writing needs to be careful, and a failure at such a basic level as using web to apply to email does not bode well for the utility of the article... >> >> >> d/ >> -- >> Dave Crocker >> Brandenburg InternetWorking >> +1.408.246.8253 >> dcrocker a t ... >> WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net >> > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu > GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2 >