Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

On 17 Nov 2021, at 6:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:

This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html

Workgroup: Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft: draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00 Updates: 1122 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122>, 1812 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1812>, 2827 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2827>, 3704 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3704> (if approved) Published: 8 November 2021 Perhaps it was just submitted 144 days too earlier and thus was miscategorized? ;-) /John Disclaimer(s): my views alone. Contains 100% recycled electrons.