In message <ff4bd087-2a84-b9d9-6f5b-715826a35aa6@brenac.eu>,
thomas brenac <thomas@brenac.eu> wrote:
>Thank you Ronald, I also heard of governance issue in AFRINIC by some
>people during the last RIPE meeting so the word is spreading. Now is
>there any other /16 impacted to your knowledge ? Would be worth pushing
>to have them in as many Drop list as possible maybe :)
As reported in Jan Vermeulen's article on the web site mybroadband.co.za
published December 4, there has been, and continues to be a large number
of blocks, both "legacy" blocks and other blocks, that were stolen from
the Afrinic free pool. These blocks are of varying sizes, generally /16
blocks but also some larger ones as well as a few smaller ones.
The list of affected legacy blocks from Jan's article are as follows:
196.10.64.0/19
196.10.61.0/24
196.10.62.0/23
160.121.0.0/16
155.235.0.0/16
152.108.0.0/16
155.237.0.0/16
169.129.0.0/16
165.25.0.0/16
160.122.0.0/16
168.80.0.0/15
165.3.0.0/16
165.4.0.0/16
165.5.0.0/16
160.115.0.0/16
In addition to all of the above, I have some reason to believe that the
following additional legacy block WAS (past tense) stolen, but has now
been reclaimed by, and ressigned to its rightful modern owner:
152.108.0.0/16
It is highly probable that there are other and additional legacy blocks
that have also been stolen. I have been prevented from fully completing
my research work on this part of the problem by ongoing stonewalling by
Afrinic. Specifically, despite Afrinic having a defined protocol whereby
legitimate researchers may request confidential access to the unredacted
Afrinic WHOIS data base for legitimate research purposes... a protocol
and a process which is fully supported and operational at all of the other
four global RIRs... Afrinic has, for reasons unknown, elected to only
provide redacted versions of its WHOIS data base which are identical
to what may be obtained at any time, and without any special protocol,
directly from Afrinic's FTP server (via anonymous FTP). Because the
accurate identification of stolen Afrinic legacy blocks involves the
careful analysis of the *unredacted* contact person: records, access to
only the redacted data base is of no value whatsoever in the task of
identifying stolen Afrinic legacy blocks.
Here is the page on the Afrinic web site where they needlessly torment
legitimate researchers into believing that they will be able to get the
same kind of unredacted WHOIS data base access as is provided, upon
vetting and approval, by all of the other RIRs:
https://www.afrinic.net/services/207-bulk-whois-access
The list of blocks that appear to have been stolen from the Afrinic free
pool, as published in Jan's Dec 4 article are as follows:
"Infoplan"/"Network and Information Technology Limited":
196.16.0.0/14
196.4.36.0/22
196.4.40.0/22
196.4.44.0/23
"Cape of Good Hope Bank"/"CGHB":
165.52.0.0/14
137.171.0.0/16
160.184.0.0/16
168.211.0.0/16
192.96.146.0/24 -- NOTE!! -- 100% legitimate legacy allocation!
The following additional blocks had also been stolen from the Afrinic free
pool. I had informed Jan about these blocks also, but for some reason
these were not mentioned in Jan's Dec 4th article. (I assume that this
was simply a clerical oversight on Jan's part. I had given him quite
a lot of material to sort through.)
"ITC":
196.194.0.0/15
196.246.0.0/16
196.45.112.0/20
196.42.128.0/17
196.193.0.0/16
"Link Data Group":
160.255.0.0/16
196.62.0.0/16
198.54.232.0/24
196.207.64.0/18
196.192.192.0/18
160.181.0.0/16
213.247.0.0/19
As of this moment, Afrinic has properly reclaimed all of the "ITC" and
"Link Data Group" and "Cape of Good Hope Bank"/"CGHB" blocks. Those
blocks are now officially unregistered. I am informed and believe that
it is Afrinic's intent to place all of these blocks into a "quarantine"
status for a minimum of 1 year, which I think is entirely proper and
prudent, under the circumstances.
I have no explanation for why Afrinic has not yet reclaimed any of the
"Infoplan"/"Network and Information Technology Limited" blocks, especially
the 196.16.0.0/14 block. This is for me deeply troubling, as I have some
reason to believe that these blocks were stolen by a party or parties,
who were also Afrinic insiders, but people other than the one "insider"
perpetrator of these crimes who has already been identified by myself and
Jan, and who is now the subject of a police investigation in Mauritius.
I am not personally aware of any action that Afrinic has taken to try to
remediate the situation with regards to the stolen legacy blocks, as
listed above. These blocks all quite provably had their associated
person: contact records fiddled in the WHOIS data base in a manner so
as to redirect both emails and phone calls to either the perpetrators
or those others to whom the perpetrators had re-sold these stolen goods.
In fact, I am not even sure that Afrinic even has the capability to undo
the damage in the case of these legacy blocks and their fiddled contact
person: records. Quite obviously, proper remediation of the affected
person: records would involve restoring those to what they were before
they had been fradulently fiddled. Completion of that task is quite
obviously dependent upon Afrinic having access to historical backups of
its own WHOIS data base from as much as ten years ago. It is not at this
moment clear to me that Afrinic is even in possession of such historical
backups, and the fact that they have, as yet, made no apparent efforts to
remediate the fradulently fiddled person: records suggests to me that they
likely do not possess such backups.
Many of the legacy blocks and many parts of the blocks that were stolen
from the Afrinic free pool, both those that have been reclaimed and those
that haven't yet been reclaimed, continue to be routed by various parties
on behalf of the thieves and black market buyers of these blocks even as
we speak. I hope to be able to post a fully list of those routes and the
relevant ASNs that are providing the ongoing routing for various parts of
this mass of stolen booty in the very near future.
Regards,
rfg