The title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any* operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately worried. I figure it warrants a discussion. This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to keep and bear arms. They have no standing to lecture us about human rights, as
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote: their body largely consists of mass murderers and thieves.
Not that I don't agree it's criminal for a tyrant to disconnect their country from the Internet, but they are tyrants after all. The problem is that even stating that denying access to the internet violates human rights allows the UN to begin to get it's claws into regulating the internet. These guys want it to be a right? I'm forwarding the UNSG my home DSL bill. Let him pay it. Obviously you're correct regarding firearms, without recognizing the basic right to
On 6/5/2011 8:11 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: protect human life against criminals and despots, there are no other rights (as a criminal and despot will take those rights with impunity). Andrew