On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 12 jun 2011, at 12:35, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Could you point to any RFC which implies or explicitly states that DHCPv6 MUST NOT be used in absence of RA with M and/or O=1?
But what's the alternative? Always run DHCPv6 even if there are no router advertisements or router advertisements with O=0, M=0?
That would seem to be the logical outcome, yes.
Like I said before, that would pollute the network with many multicasts which can seriously degrade wifi performance.
Regardless of it's potential downsides, the issue at hand was the RFC compliance of such a setup. Owen DeLong contended that: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:12:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
As it currently stands, an RFC-compliant host will not attempt to solicit a DHCP response unless it receives an RA with the M inclusive-or O bits set.
Daniel was merely requesting a reference for that assertion. If you have one, I'm sure Daniel (and Owen) would appreciate it. - Matt