1 Feb
2012
1 Feb
'12
9:26 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
They do internal aggregation of common prefixes to keep their internal tables small, see for instance this rather old preso:
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt
why should swisscom pay for your traffic engineering?
Nobody at all is asking them to pay for it. But do you seriously expect their routing tables to become full to bursting because, for example, they checked the ARIN route registry, RADB etc instead of blindly using minimum prefix size defaults? Or are swamp space legacy IP ranges with minimum prefix size of /24 that easy to get in this day and age? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)