Re: Spamhaus

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder@opus1.com> wrote:

but the false positive count jumped by 112 messages per 10,000 (because APEWS was somehow having a lousy month).

In general, the more reputation services you include, the more likely it is you're going to have false positives.

Christ. You pick APEWS as a reputation filter.. and then even bother to *count* the false positives? That's not a list that's particularly designed to minimize FPs, to put it very mildly. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)