I here tell the spoofer project people are looking to improve their data and stats... And reporting. On Feb 5, 2014 1:08 PM, "Livingood, Jason" < Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
Cool, thanks for the pointed. Now if we could get the data by ASN and publish it on a site like bcp38.info, that would be awesome.
On 2/4/14, 11:03 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com> wrote:
Here's such a report:
http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php
Frank
-----Original Message----- From: Livingood, Jason [mailto:Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:53 PM To: Octavio Alvarez; North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
On 2/4/14, 7:48 PM, "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote:
What I'm failing to understand, and again, please excuse me if I'm oversimplifying, is what data do you need from researchers, specifically. What specific actionable data would be helpful? Why does the lack of the data prevent you from applying an ACL.
What I am suggesting is that the community at large needs measurement data, rather than individual network operators (which already know if they do or do not implement BCP38). Only with a long list of operators that DO prevent spoofing and a list of those that DO NOT, backed up with a decent data set (enough measurement points, enough measurement tests, across enough time, with an openly shared methodology), can the community start to encourage non-adopters to change their position. Just my two cents though...
Jason