16 Nov
2009
16 Nov
'09
11:14 a.m.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:04, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder@wisc.edu> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Gary Mackenzie wrote:
Having slightly lost track of what everybody is using for peering routers these days, what is the consensus about the best alternative to Juniper M series routers?
have you looked at the MX series?
+1 ~Chris
Dale
I had looked briefly, does anybody here actually use them as peering routers? I've seen a few implementations using them in the MPLS P and PE router roles but never as border routers. If there is some precedent for using them in this role that's good to hear and I'll take another look, I was loath to move away from Juniper as our current boxes are been the model of reliability. Cheers Gary