8 Jun
2007
8 Jun
'07
9:35 a.m.
Well, it seems to be a standard operating procedure that anyone in a high profile case gets accused of possessing "child porn" via anonymous leaks from the police to the national press. (See the Forest Gate incident - not only did they tear the guy's house apart looking for nonexistent "chemical weapons", they "accidentally" shot him, then they briefed the tabloids that his computer was riddled with evil images of children. Naturally, he was never prosecuted for same.) If any UK ISP is willing to NOT do this, you've got my business.