On 29/07/14 22:22, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
In message <20140729225352.GO7836@hezmatt.org>, Matt Palmer writes:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:28:53AM +1200, Tony Wicks wrote:
2. IPv6 is nice (dual stack) but the internet without IPv4 is not a viable thing, perhaps one day, but certainly not today (I really hate clueless people who shout to the hills that IPv6 is the "solution" for today's internet access)
Do you have IPv6 deployed and available to your entire customer base, so that those who want to use it can do so? To my way of thinking, CGNAT is probably going to be the number one driver of IPv6 adoption amongst the broad customer base, *as long as their ISP provides it*.
Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you need to do from day 1.
That would be nice, but I’m not 100% convinced that it is true.
Though it will be an increasing percentage over time.
Definitely a good way of reducing the load on your CGN, with the additional benefit that your network is part of the solution rather than part of the problem.
Being on the content provider side I don't know the actual percentages in practice, but in the NANOG region you've got Google/Youtube, NetFlix, Akamai & Facebook all having a significant amount of their services v6 native. I'd be very surprised if these four together weren't a majority of any consumer-facing network's traffic in peak times.