Of course the access isn't direct -- there is a firewall and a router in between. The access is indirect. --- () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org
-----Original Message----- From: Jason L. Sparks [mailto:jlsparks@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 09 June, 2013 04:24 To: ku po Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project
To be fair, the reporting (initially) claimed the providers were granting the USG "access directly to their servers." It's understandable and appropriate that the providers pushed back against that apparently erroneous reporting.
Jason
On Jun 8, 2013, at 22:44, ku po <cciehelps@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the point to argue whether they have the capacity to process all the data? They DON'T need to build expensive systems. They just need to make sure when they ask your company for information, these information are available for them and fast enough. So the statement that saying "we don't give them direct access" means nothing!!! The right question is IS THERE A DIRECT CHANNEL for them to ask you for information without providing all the evidence( how could they show you all the evidence when it is security related??), which you can't deny their access.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:20 AM, James Harrison <james@talkunafraid.co.uk>wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2013 16:31, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:25 AM, jamie rishaw <j@arpa.com> wrote:
Just wait until we find out dark and lit private fiber is getting vampired.
Why wait?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/politics/20submarine.html?_r=0
-Bill
In a similar vein, a new PRISM slide was released by the Guardian this morning:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-prism-server-
collection-facebook-google >> >> Doesn't specifically say private fiber - just "fiber cables and >> infrastructure". May just refer to fiber to/from/within complying >> company infrastructure, ofc, not necessarily anything else. >> >> They also apparently have a web 2.0 compliant dashboard with a catchy >> name and pop-ups with big numbers in: Boundless Informant. >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant- global-datamining >> >> Speaking from the other side of the pond it's interesting to see where >> this is going. GCHQ (the UK NSA equivalent) are being asked stern >> questions by the government about their involvement and if they've >> been asking the NSA for UK citizens' data (since they're not allowed >> to collect it themselves). >> >> Cheers, >> James Harrison >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlGzyl4ACgkQ22kkGnnJQAwVfQCePSYz9p5P95bnWYbp4YA2SeQD >> HeQAn0AOnReV6DQC0Y3k5P046BbFnBUJ >> =auDI >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>