19 Feb
2005
19 Feb
'05
7:22 a.m.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
Scott Weeks wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
: want to see at this headache of a position, or we do it openly on the
Yes, publically. Please.
Publically - on NANOG itself, please.
Please no. Speaking as someone for whom this place was a learning resource for many years until I was able to give back in kind, the 'governance' stuff may be important but it is not operational. Betty already said there will be governance and direction handled on nanog-futures. That's the Right Place. Joe, not a party to any of the reform stuff just someone who want to restore utilitity to the list. -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE