* jra@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 23:21 CEST]:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=nanog@bakker.net> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 1:42:08 PM Subject: Re: This DNS over HTTP thing
* jra@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 19:30 CEST]:
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> What many people dismiss as 'lying' would be typically described as 'complying with the law' in certain countries. It is unfortunate that operators in countries with legally-mandated DNS blocks are criticized for the actions they have no option but to undertake. IMO any such criticisms should more correctly be directed at the laws themselves or the governments that put them in place.
HTTP/451
Completely different protocol than what the rest of this thread is about, much more invasive wrt possibility of logging, and requires a lot more infrastructure and actual lying in DNS to make work.
Closed captioned for the analogy-impaired:
"The idea you're talking about, Jason, is analogous to that embodied in the 451 error code in HTTP."
Oh, you weren't proposing a technical solution to a social problem? -- Niels.