5 Feb
2004
5 Feb
'04
8:11 p.m.
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:56:13 EST, "Steven M. Bellovin" said:
Why is that bad? I have no objection to giving vendors a reasonable amount of time to fix problems before announcing the whole. Or is your point that two days hardly seems like enough time to develop -- and *test* -- a fix?
Two days is plenty if it's a Homer Simpson-esque "D'Oh!" bug. Probably not if it's something that requires some regression testing.