18 Jun
2009
18 Jun
'09
3:51 p.m.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:05 -0400, Sandy Murphy a écrit :
This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the nanog-attendees list,
How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list. Wouldn't it be natural to broadcast any kind of content to the entire community?
nanog-attendees is intended to be used for social and specific conference related topics. Topics discussed at the conference with operational relevance should be here on the main list. If anyone feels the need to follow up on the nanog-attendees/nanog distinction, please do so on nanog-futures. Thanks! Kris MLC Chair