30 Mar
2020
30 Mar
'20
5:01 a.m.
On 30 Mar 2020, at 08:18, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 01:58, Ragnar Sundblad <ragge@kth.se> wrote:
A protocol with varying packet size, as the NTS protected NTP is, can easily have the bad property of having responses larger than the requests if not taken care. Don’t you see that?
Why? Why not pad requests to guarantee attenuation vector until authenticity of packets can be verified?
Right, and NTS does that. Ragnar