1) please join the list properly and stop replying to the digests.
(note there have been many folks asking you to do this, disconnected message/new-threads
are super super super annoying and remove the parts of the discussion from a coherent thread)
<snip>
1) " ... 240/4 is way
more effort than its proponents want to believe and even if it
were reclassified effectively as GUA, it doesn’t buy all that
much life for IPv4.
... ": Perhaps you have not bothered to scan through a two
page whitepaper (URL below, again) that I submitted a week or so
ago? It promises simple implementation and significant increase
of assignable IPv4 addresses, even extendable to the similar
size of IPv6 if we could forgo our mentality about the IP
addresses as "Personal Properties", by switching to treat them
as "Natural Resources".
This paper is super thin on any reasonable level of detail, and seems to wholly miss the mark on ipv4 usage patterns.
<snip>