Re: Hi

Guilty for clue-impairment is a lot different than guilty of intent to spread. As for clue-impairment, I think everyone here agrees that Cisco should have this well filtered. If this was your intended statement, then yes, agreed. It was the implication of malice that I think was inappropriate, especially in a public forum.

Well hang on a bit there.... shouldn't merit have this filtered as well? Agreed the person who opened the said SCR should have had a clue, but what about merit protecting its subscribers? At very least one would think they would be geared up to thwart the spread of such viruses. X-Virus-Scanned: by MailScan