On Wednesday 03 May 2006 22:28, Joe Maimon wrote:
<COUNTER-RANT> You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
On the subject of which I'm in discussion with AOL to get email through that contains something which is a known spammers trick, because it is also the right thing to have in our emails <sigh>. Content is not always a good clue.
a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted b) and wanted by AOL employees themselves
I thought these went to aol.NET which has different spam filtering in place.
And if they did know how to accurately determine that, we wouldnt be having this discussion.
:)
Just point your intended receivers to AOL's help desk.
That just creates Chinese whispers. For technical issues it really helps if providers can take reports from "non-customers", or people providing services to their existing clients. This seems impossible for many big companies.
You get what you pay for.
I think choosing providers carefully can get you more for less.
</RANT>
AOL have employees who regularly read SPAM-L, which is probably a better forum for such questions. Although in an ideal world "postmaster@" would work, it rarely seems to with AOL.