6 Oct
2002
6 Oct
'02
11:40 p.m.
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
RD> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:05:32 -0400 (EDT) RD> From: Ralph Doncaster
RD> Not really, what I want is router A to learn that ther is no RD> next hop IP- the subnet is on the local ethernet.
As others are saying... it isn't "local". It's not "local" unless in the same subnet. Physical topology often correlates with higher layers, but it's not strictly 1:1.
Manually configuring a static route in router A would achieve the result: ip route 172.16.16.0 255.255.255.0 fa0/0 However, I'm surprised that there's no dynamic routing protocol that allows you to do everything you can with static routes. -Ralph