On Sat, 30 May 1998, Kim Hubbard wrote:
Mr. Rubenstein,
I was very concerned after reading your message so I reviewed every message regarding your latest request.
You state that you haven't been able to receive address space, however, our records show that you were "approved" for a block of addresses on March 27, 1998.
Interesting. The allocation approval was never mailed to me, the block isn't visible in WHOIS, and I haven't rec'd an invoice.
Your request was handled by Cathy Clements who is one of the most professional individuals around. She also happens to have the patience of a saint (as I'm sure many ISPs could attest to).
I'm sorry if you were not happy with ARIN's service, however, IMO at no time could any of Cathy's messages be considered rude or be perceived as having an attitude of "why are you bothering me", as you claim.
If you would check my original mail, I didn't claim 'rude'; the 'why are you bothering me' was more of an air of inattentiveness, timelyness (sp?), etc. I mean, the question still stands; why does it take 48 to 72 hours to get a response when sending responses to ARINs qualification requests?
The ARIN policies have not changed since InterNIC, nor have the basic questions we ask on utilization.
Maybe from your prospective, when you have the policy book in your hand or memorized. But, things are way different from ours (and I am sure others).
Kim
Thank you for your response. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am. Alex Rubenstein, alex@nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 Don't choose a spineless ISP! We have more backbone! http://www.nac.net -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --