13 Jul
2015
13 Jul
'15
12:04 p.m.
The point is you'd already have a 192 address or something, and it would only grab the external address for a short duration for use as an external PAT address, thus oversubscribing the ip4 pool to users who need it (based on dns). Its still pretty broken, but less broken than you describe. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM, <A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi,
This is actually a good idea. Roll out an IPV6 only network and only pass out an IPV4 address if it's needed based on actual traffic.
yes...shame someones applied for a patent on that! ;-)
alan