6 Sep
2008
6 Sep
'08
3:13 p.m.
On 9/6/08, Anton Kapela <tkapela@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> wrote:
found a network operator using uRPF on Cisco gear. (note: network operator. it's probably fine for several-hundred-meg enterprise sites)
Forgive me, but what does bits/sec have to do with anything?
it's possible that on some platforms the uRPF check happens on the main processor, or on a linecard processor. So, bps rates (proxied for by pps rates) matter greatly, on those platforms. -Chris