Hi Paul, you comment leaves me confused. 25,000 24s up 20% in the last six months means 5,000 NEW prefix 24s in the global routing tables. Where did they come from? I ask because I had thought that it was just about impossible to get a 24 routed at the nets defaultless core. And that this impossibility has been around for at least the last 6 months. I thought that if "cooknet" as a new MCI customer has a 24 handed to it by mci all nice and cidrized that "cooknet's" 24 would never appear in your list being aggregated by mci along with other 24s to make a smaller prefix that would be announced eventually in the global tables? Have I misunderstood something or is theory diverging from practice. ************************************************************************ The COOK Report on Internet For subsc. pricing & more than 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ten megabytes of free material (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) visit http://pobox.com/cook/ Internet: cook@cookreport.com For case study of MercerNet & TIIAP induced harm to local community http://pobox.com/cook/mercernet.html ************************************************************************ On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Paul A Vixie wrote:
Without pointing fingers, there are some 9K prefixes that could be removed by proper aggregation/reconfiguration.
There are also 25,000 /24's, up 20% from six months ago. I don't have any figures on how many are in the "swamp", but I think this is the most fruitful place to try to cap growth or hack it back:
Total routes: 39670
8 22 0.1% 9 1 0.0% 10 4 0.0% 11 6 0.0% 12 14 0.0% 13 30 0.1% 14 102 0.3% 15 173 0.4% 16 5687 14.3% 17 246 0.6% 18 493 1.2% 19 921 2.3% 20 954 2.4% 21 1200 3.0% 22 1824 4.6% 23 2425 6.1% 24 25539 64.4% ...